• mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    250
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I already hate people who send voice messages in a world where dictation software exists. I hate whoever even thought of joking about this even more.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I have literally given up friendships from people that wouldn’t stop sending me voice messages.

      I accept it from family, kids, the elderly and such. I just can’t believe people want me to turn off my music and slowly listen to your shitty voice when I can easily multitask.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I just never set up my voicemail. Then people who actually have a chance of successfully contacting me know not to even try the phone.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The dictation software we have is pretty shitty though. It almost always needs proof-read, or re-dictated several times to get it right. At that point you may as well just send an audio clip.

      Until the day that dictation software gets it 100% correct, it’s not going to be worth my time.

      For now, the human on the other end will always have an easier time understand an audio clip than a machine, because human minds are more capable of using context and getting past regional accents.

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’ll read comments, but I would never listen to voice comments. Literally never. I’d spend an hour googling for context and solutions before I’d listen to a voice message in the code pages.

          Voice is objectively the worst way to convey data via computer. It almost always wastes my time, is horrible to skim for relevant info, and for complex topics is an absolute nightmare.

          Text is so, so much more efficient. I can’t imagine why anyone would want this. If it’s ever implemented, please don’t make it obvious. Nobody should be encouraged to inflict this on coworkers or future devs.

          e: errant ’s’

      • TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most of the times I get a voice message it could be written in two sentences, but they still decide to make it a two minute voice message. Just a lot of useless stuff added for free

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sorry, hon. It’s hardwired into humans to add in code for “I am alive and not cackling mad or suicidal yet today” during “conversations.” It would probably be more effective at screening for bots than captcha, but not as good at training bots.

      • Nahvi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        The dictation software we have is pretty shitty though.

        As someone who used dictation software when said software needed to be trained first and also trained its users how to speak more clearly, it always amazes me when I hear people say things like this.

        The problem is human speech is lazy and inaccurate. Half of the time I have to listen to a voice clip there are two or three words in the clip that are barely intelligible. If I don’t catch it by the third pass I stop and just guess by context. It is the same thing the AWESOME dictation software we have today does, but saves me the time and effort and gives the sender a chance to fix their own mumbles.

        Of course, I’m one of those people whose voicemail message used to be, “Don’t leave me a message unless your call went straight to voicemail. I will see your missed call and call you back.”

  • Malix@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    but what about programmers with problems hearing? An alternative of webcam video with sign language, pantomime and subtitles is needed!

    edit: OOH! Use AI to generate the sign language videos. Could be wild, considering how good AI is at drawing hands.

      • trailing9@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You joke but with chatGPT it’s inevitable. Old school programmers will stick to source code but tools for non-programmers will collect plain text descriptions to create functionality.

        Inevitably, images and all other media will become part of it.

        Future developers will have to navigate those collections and wonder why a functionality doesn’t work when they remove some side-tracking Instagram stories. They will shrug, leave them in place and heap on further memes and comments until they complete their jira ticket.

        • IonAddis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          So what I’m hearing is that computer code will eventually drift closer to DNA where “noncoding” sequences actually perform regulatory functions but in a way that’s super-arcane, and all you know is if you get rid of the noncoding bits the proteins change expression for some bizarre reason…

    • aaron@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      This guy embeds TicTok URLs in source comments followed by long strings of emoji

  • Luftruessel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looking at how good textual documentation works, it would probably be a 3s long note reading out the method name

    • UpperBroccoli@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh hahaha nooooo, it would be 15 seconds, and it would start with a sigh and deep, troubled breathing noises, a finger tapping the mic and someone saying “is this thing on” before the entirely useless comment even starts.

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Obviously they should be using syntactically correct JavaDoc format here so the voice messages can be converted to HTML

  • tetrahedron@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am deaf. i already struggle with keeping up with subtitles on tutorial videos of some obscure stuff that has little to no docs. Kindly return this idea to a void function instead and try not to catch the erroneous thread with these satanic proposals.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would enable this in my project so I can ban any contributor who submits an MR with it

  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah yes, source code files that aren’t plain text and can only be opened by certain editors, exactly what the software industry needs

  • bort@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    why use a resource folder for it, when you can embed a base64 encoding directly into the source file?

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fantastic idea but I don’t think it goes far enough. Why stop at comments? I want to be able to write whole functions and classes like that!