• threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I don’t think so.

    Even Starship v1 (which have already ceased production) had an estimated payload to LEO comparable to a reusable Falcon Heavy (~50 tonnes). Starship v2 (scheduled to launch in January) has a projected payload to LEO around 100 tonnes, and v3 will be higher still.

    • 7toed@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Okay then why did they only launch a banana as cargo? I thought the EV was a standard test payload

      • Morphit @feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Standard for what? The first Dragon payload was a wheel of cheese.

        It’s just something silly they wanted to do. You can’t seriously think the max payload capacity of starship to almost-LEO is one single banana.

        • 7toed@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Like heavy then, why did they not use an actual test payload before now already being done with starship v1? Hypothetical payload to orbit doesnt count if you never done it 🤷‍♂️

          • Morphit @feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Why would they need to prove anything? SpaceX knows how much the vehicle can lift. They will be their own first customers with Starlink when they finally go into orbit. The re-entry and recovery systems are much more important to SpaceX and since they haven’t inserted into a full orbit yet, what would it even prove? The haters are wrong on one more weird conspiracy?