Darwin@feddit.deM to Atheism@feddit.de · 1 年前Christian roulettefeddit.deimagemessage-square94fedilinkarrow-up1721arrow-down129
arrow-up1692arrow-down1imageChristian roulettefeddit.deDarwin@feddit.deM to Atheism@feddit.de · 1 年前message-square94fedilink
minus-squareJackGreenEarth@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·1 年前Atheism still isn’t science, it’s just supported by science.
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 年前Sure, it’s more appropriate to say that atheism is the logical conclusion you arrive to when applying the scientific method to religion.
minus-squareHonytawk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前Of course Atheism isn’t science, they are 2 different labels with different names to point to different things. A hexagon also isn’t a square, yet they do have similarities and are connected.
Atheism still isn’t science, it’s just supported by science.
Sure, it’s more appropriate to say that atheism is the logical conclusion you arrive to when applying the scientific method to religion.
Of course Atheism isn’t science, they are 2 different labels with different names to point to different things.
A hexagon also isn’t a square, yet they do have similarities and are connected.