• rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s got to be the ticketing taking too much vig, right? I hear these stories about $300 tickets, I haven’t been to a concert in years but in the 2000’s touring was where the money came from. With $45+ticketmaster tickets.

      They have to be sucking all the money out at point of sale

      • astanix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        1 month ago

        Just look at ticket prices on ticketmaster for a US show and compare it to the cost of an international venue.

        When I was pricing David Gilmour it was literally cheaper to buy a plane ticket and fly from NY to Rome and go to the show there than get the worst seats in Madison Square Garden.

        • Dupree878@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 month ago

          Because Ticketmaster and it’s venues are a monopoly. Pearl Jam tried to warn us 30 years ago.

      • Dupree878@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 month ago

        The ticketing company owns all the venues now and they own the secondhand scalper sites so they allocate a bunch of tickets to the secondhand site and mark them way up plus they can charge whatever they want for the venue and only pay the artist what they were contracted for

      • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s also probably one of the few ways for artists to have an income that their lable/manager/publisher/whoever the fuck else doesn’t take a huge cut of. Add in ticket master and company and they’re fucked.

        Those contracts they sign can be fucking brutal. I’m not familiar with either of those artists but it’s a common enough problem in that industry.

      • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Was ever thus, init.

        The options are 1) Charge less and sell more, or 2) Charge much more and sell less, but make up more than the difference in how much more they charge.

        They always, always take option 2 because they’re shitheads who feel like they have a legal duty to put the shareholders above the customers.

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      You can still make great money if you’re packing out big venues. I don’t know who either of these people are so I wouldn’t be surprised if they aren’t able to sell out big amphitheaters or stadiums. Small venue shows are great but they aren’t buying you multiple houses.