EleventhHour@lemmy.world to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-217 hours agoSounds like a threatlemmy.worldimagemessage-square121fedilinkarrow-up1525arrow-down118file-text
arrow-up1507arrow-down1imageSounds like a threatlemmy.worldEleventhHour@lemmy.world to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-217 hours agomessage-square121fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareWilzax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·10 hours agoStooping to their level on campaign tactics would not make us just as bad, because our means are equal and the ends we want to achieve are nobler than theirs. If A=B and C>D, then A+C > B+D
minus-squareEleventhHour@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·9 hours agoBoth sides are not the same, therefore your logical equation is flawed. A!=B
minus-squareWilzax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·3 hours agoThe operating word here is “Would”. This is a hypothetical.
minus-squareEleventhHour@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 hours agoWhether or not it hypothetical is irrelevant. Your logic is flawed, and so, therefore, is your conclusion.
Stooping to their level on campaign tactics would not make us just as bad, because our means are equal and the ends we want to achieve are nobler than theirs.
If A=B and C>D, then A+C > B+D
Both sides are not the same, therefore your logical equation is flawed.
A!=B
The operating word here is “Would”. This is a hypothetical.
Whether or not it hypothetical is irrelevant. Your logic is flawed, and so, therefore, is your conclusion.