• JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    She’s running against arguably the worst candidate in American history and it’s still a dead heat, what does that tell you?

    • SeriousMite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      He might be the best candidate for hateful idiots though. The guy’s a chud whisperer. I’m not sure if any smarter more articulate Republican could hold together the same radical coalition.

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Harris must be a nasty woman like Hillary Clinton. It can’t be because the other side has been propagandized until it went nuts.

        • Zorg@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I’m guessing they were being sarcastic. Unfortunately a lot of people have yet to realize sarcasm is anything but obvious online, at least not in this day and age.

          • JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I think I understood their sarcasm. They think I’m engaging in misogynistic tendencies and do actually think Trump voters are “nuts”.

            • AmidFuror@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 hours ago

              For the record, I don’t know if you personally judge Harris as a woman. I have no reason to think that’s true, and I don’t know if you hate Hillary, let alone your reason if you do.

              But I think a lot of the hate for Hillary was misogynist, and many people made the argument that if Trump is awful, Hillary must have been worse to lose.

              • JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                24 minutes ago

                I think I understood the first paragraph before your comment but thank you for the clarification. And I do generally agree with your second paragraph as well. I do think it’s a bit reductive and is often used to draw attention from the more substantial reasons.

                Also deciding people are nuts is a great way to alienate and isolate them which will only entrench those ideas and can further radicalize them.