If any significant number of community members are opposed to this, we can discuss it further.

Judging by the reactions to the recently-posted, now-removed NMS AI content, it seems it’s generally poorly-received and people (including me) would prefer it not to be featured in this community.

  • NMSGalacticHub@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Judging by the multitude of posts on your profile praising AI, I think what you really mean is, “Moderating which doesn’t conform to my biases and is therefore bad.”

    Judging by this rule announcement receiving an overwhelmingly positive reaction, I think the majority of this community does not share in your bias. “Bad moderating” would be disregarding the actual will of the community.

    And on that note, you seem to have never contributed to this, or any other, No Man’s Sky community so I’m going to write your opinion off as irrelevant.

    • tee9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      Its a meme of an ideology to combat ai for its own sake, and that appears to be what this is about given your responses to the original commenter.

      It makes sense to combat ai in this community if it creates a lot of bad content. Curious how much ai content you’ve successfully identified, or if you would allow content that was aided by ai but then further developed.

      Just doesnt seem super enforceable, and it doesnt really make sense to me. The low effort raw prompt output is one thing, ai all together is another.

      • NMSGalacticHub@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Okay, then it’s “a meme” which the vast majority of this community would like to see enforced as a rule. That changes nothing.

        If we can’t tell it’s AI, then don’t worry about it! (Everyone can always tell.)

        It doesn’t need to make sense to you. You aren’t active in this community. This post was specifically to solicit the opinions of community members, which you are not. Thus your opinion was not solicited and is not desired. (And yes, this is the internet, you can offer it anyway, if you’re into wasting your time.)

        • tee9000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          If a single post with ten downvotes necessitates such a paradigm shift then by all means.

          So is the rule going to say “no ai, unless we cant tell”? Or are you going to leave that up to interpretation?

          • NMSGalacticHub@lemmy.worldOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            It’s not a paradigm shift. It’s the developing standard for the non-corporate internet in general. As you are not a member of this community, I will not be replying to you further.

            • tee9000@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              22 days ago

              Ai is not inherently corporate, but i get what you mean and why you might opt for non-ai content. You do run the risk of losing me as a friend though, because ai is cool.