Meta is restricting the use of the upside-down red triangle emoji, a reference to Hamas combat operations that has become a broader symbol of Palestinian resistance, on its Facebook and Instagram, and WhatsApp platforms, according to internal content moderation materials reviewed by The Intercept.

Since the beginning of the Israeli assault on Gaza, Hamas has regularly released footage of its successful strikes on Israeli military positions with red triangles superimposed above targeted soldiers and armor. Since last fall, use of the red triangle emoji has expanded online, becoming a widely used icon for people expressing pro-Palestinian or anti-Israeli sentiment. Social media users have included the shape in their posts, usernames, and profiles as a badge of solidarity and protest.

The symbol has become common enough that the Israeli military has used it as shorthand in its own propaganda: In November, Al Jazeera reported on an Israeli military video that warned “Our triangle is stronger than yours, Abu Obeida,” addressing Hamas’s spokesperson.

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    What is this even in reference to?

    Seriously? Did you just see the word “Israel” and start arguing without knowing the topic at hand?

    • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Asking you what you mean by calling the triangle a “targeting reticle” absolutely does not mean I don’t know the topic at hand, its me asking you to clarify your argumentation.

        • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The article also mentions that Israel has started using it in their own propaganda videos. showing the triangle over targets as they’re hit, and when you flip it like that there’s a very clear implication of destroying the symbol of freedom… Which is to say, I still fail to see your ultimate point. You’re just pointing at the news article and saying “SEE! THEY SAY ITS BAD!”

          Could you provide some actual argumentation to go with that?

          And just so it doesnt seem like I’m running, “Targeting reticle” would imply a weapon optic or similar, hence my confusion. “using it to mark targets” would have been clearer.

          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I’m certainly not going to defend anything Israel is doing here. Both sides in this debacle are bloodthirsty maniacs.

            • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              33 minutes ago

              Sorry, i dont want to be rude, but do you actually have any arguments other than gesturing at the article & giving both-sides-isms?

              Hamas has committed war crimes, yes, however it shouldn’t be ignored that Israel is currently engaged in terrorism, genocide, land grabs, torture of prisoners and more. Simply saying “both sides bad” lays the blame more evenly than it should be laid.