• DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I mean, the kids are neither in a ballsack nor the ovaries.

    If you consider a fertilized egg a child, which you shouldn’t, they would be in the uterus.

    If it’s inside an ovary, the mother’s going to die.

    • uid0gid0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      13 hours ago

      You guys need some anatomy lessons. Women are born with all the oocytes (eggs) they will ever have. They don’t make them on demand like dudes do sperm. So it is entirely accurate to say any children a woman will have are already in her ovaries, barring circumstances like surrogacy, adoption, etc.

          • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Which is what I said in my post that uid0grid0 responded to, saying that I needed anatomy lessons.

            Sperm is not a child.
            An egg is not a child.
            A fertilized egg is also not a child, but some people think it is.

            • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Some people also don’t take this anywhere that serious and y’all’s conversation seems really silly. Nobody on Lemmy (within reason, I’m sure there are idiots here too) is going to seriously argue that either gamete is a child.

              These types of conversations are the ones that make me question just how prevalent autism is on Lemmy. People engage in wordplay and don’t literally mean what they say all the time yet these types of comments are 90% on posts like this.