literature.cafe
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 years ago

Biden to Target Industrial Pollution in a 2nd Term, if He Gets One

www.nytimes.com

external-link
message-square
14
link
fedilink
82
external-link

Biden to Target Industrial Pollution in a 2nd Term, if He Gets One

www.nytimes.com

silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
14
link
fedilink
If the president wins re-election, his climate team is likely to try to cut greenhouse gases from steel, cement and other hard-to-clean-up manufacturing.
  • kriz@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    i always hate this because its like…ok…but you are president now so just target it now.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      A few reasons:

      • Spending significant amounts of money needs congressional support and the Republicans control one house of Congress
      • Changing laws requires not just a majority, but a 60% supermajority in the Senate
      • The US regulatory process is designed to be slow, and the EPA lost most of its staff under Trump, so they prioritized the low-hanging fruit
      • echutaa@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Sounds like it’s probably not going to happen then if all the stars have to alight to get it.

        • DrugsMcChrist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          funny how real change is just on the horizon but always out of reach. almost as if it were by design

          • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            The US political system is designed to protect the prerogatives of the wealthy. It takes a sustained majority over time to overcome that. We’ve gotten to the point where there has been significant but not yet sufficient action:

            • Biden cut the issuance of drilling leases to the minimum required by law
            • Signed the Inflation Reduction Act
            • enacted a regulation to force vehicle electrification into law
            • passed a regulation to force fossil fuels out of most power plants

            The Washington Post has a much more complete list

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s not so much about the stars all aligning, but needing to hold a majority of the centers of power for long enough. We’ve gone from being blown off to not having the votes to do anything at all to getting significant but not yet sufficient action. Getting to where we need to be is going to happen at some point, and it’s on us to make it happen sooner rather than later.

          • echutaa@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I envy your optimism, but this just sounds like an empty promise with a built in scapegoat. What makes you so sure this will happen?

            • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’m not. It takes electing more and better Democrats instead of lurching into fascism. We could well fail, but it’s crazy to not try

            • GBU_28@lemm.eeBanned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Removed by mod

      • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          We got a lot of that:

          • Cut the issuance of drilling leases to the minimum required by law
          • pass the Inflation Reduction Act
          • enact a regulation to force vehicle electrification
          • pass a regulation to force fossil fuels out of most power plants

          The Washington Post has a much more complete list

          Some things got overturned in court, like the drilling permit moratorium.

          Also, the mid-terms were in 2022. Getting more and better Democrats in congress plus reelecting Biden would make it possible to do a lot more.

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 488 users / day
  • 1.54K users / week
  • 3.75K users / month
  • 9.61K users / 6 months
  • 12 local subscribers
  • 6.93K subscribers
  • 8.95K Posts
  • 36.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • silence7@slrpnk.net
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org