Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 24 hours agoHome Depotslrpnk.netimagemessage-square122fedilinkarrow-up1820arrow-down110
arrow-up1810arrow-down1imageHome Depotslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 24 hours agomessage-square122fedilink
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·21 hours agoPretty sure that’s Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁
minus-squarecelsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·14 hours agoIt’s actually English for “I’m so sneaky I found a way to bait people into commenting on my post”.
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down6·19 hours agonope. it’s the plural.
minus-squareBluesF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·14 hours agoThe plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-29 hours agoNope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species. They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image. Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
Pretty sure that’s Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁
It’s actually English for “I’m so sneaky I found a way to bait people into commenting on my post”.
nope. it’s the plural.
The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.
They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image.
Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.