What are cis and trans alternate types of? I don’t think it’s “gender identity” because wouldn’t that just be man, woman or nonbinary regardless of whether they’re cis or trans? Cis/trans just being a qualifier?

If the answer is “I am cis” or “I am trans”, what is the question?

Edit: Someone came up with the term “gender congruity” and (after looking up the definition of “congruity”) I think this describes what I’m talking about perfectly.

  • MrShelbySan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Please note I’m typing this as a trans man. Being “cis” or “trans” stems from someone’s gender.

    Basically, do you identify as your birth gender (not sex, gender and sex are different)? If the answer is yes, you are “cis”. If the answer is no, like I my case, I was born female, I identify as a male, then you are are trans.

    I hope this answers your question.

    • GaryPonderosa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Shouldn’t it be that you identify with your birth sex? If gender is a social construct you don’t have a gender at birth. When the doctor says “It’s a boy” they’re referring to the genitalia you have, not assigning you a social position.

  • RFBurns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    …Behaviors and lifestyle choices. They do not rise to the immutable characteristics that qualify for civil-rights protection.

    And yes; I’ve seen the sleazy Wiki edit that attaches “perceived” to the definition of “immutable”. ‘I just have to believe…’ belongs in a child’s fairytale book.

    • Hypersapien@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why do you care more about what the law requires you to do than you care about simply treating people decently? You can recognize a person’s rights even if the law doesn’t demand it.

      And why do I get the feeling that you wouldn’t recognize the civil rights of those who you do view as having “immutable characteristics” if the law didn’t tell you that you had to?

      The law is there because of people like you, to make you recognize peoples rights because you seem to be incapable of doing so otherwise.

      Your entire argument reeks of you asking “What kind of shitty behavior can I get away with?”