superkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agoThat explains it.feddit.orgimagemessage-square238fedilinkarrow-up11.58Karrow-down122
arrow-up11.56Karrow-down1imageThat explains it.feddit.orgsuperkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square238fedilink
minus-squarenailingjello@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up153arrow-down1·2 months agoGuess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
minus-squareKiwi_fella@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up42arrow-down1·2 months agoThat’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
minus-squarecasmael@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down1·2 months agoYeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 months agoAmbiguïty increases memetic potential
minus-squaremodus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoYou’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
minus-squarefeedum_sneedson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·2 months agoThey mostly are.
Guess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
That’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
Yeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
Ambiguïty increases memetic potential
You’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
They mostly are.
Fellow dyslexic ٩( ☉ o⚆)