• CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    100% depends on who’s performing. I’ve driven 500 miles for a festival, but probably wouldn’t for a single artist/one night show.

  • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Approximately 135 minutes by train, 45 minutes by tram or rapid bus, 35 minutes by urban bus or 30 minutes by bike. Exceptions to the rule exist.

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    The concert? I dunno it’s pretty close. But the company to go to the show with, that I’ll fly across the country for.

    When I was living in California, I had a friend text me he had an extra ticket to a Bad Religion concert in Chicago. So I booked a flight and went to see the show with him. Flight was a few hundred bucks, the “free” ticket was worth like $35.

    Honestly, it was totally worth it. One of the best concerts I’ve been to, probably because of who I got to see it with.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    If I have to rent a car, it’s too far.

    If I have to take an intercity bus, it’s too far.

    An intercity train ride over three hours is also too far.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m two hours from three major cities. For any major concert I must drive 2 hours. No more, no less

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Given how expensive they’re getting, the fees, the ever painfully louder volume, any travel is too much.

    However, when concerts weren’t as anti-fan ….

    • longest trip: from Boston to Florida for a weekend
    • second longest: from Boston to Buffalo
    • most: 1-3 hr
  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    At a certain distance, the concert is less the event and more a reason to plan a vacation around going to the concert.

  • Bizzle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ll do 3 hours to Chicago if it’s someone really good, but going to shows isn’t really my bag anymore and crowds really get my hackles up so generally I just stay home

  • vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I travel from Portland, Oregon to Denver, Colorado and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania every year for the Decibel Metal and Beer Festivals. Not sure how far that is, but its definitely multiple hours in a plane.

    Looking at flying out to France for Hellfest next year as well. That’s pretty far from home as well.

  • jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    It depends entirely on the band, my budget, and time. One that tours regularly, that I’ve seen before and can see again, probably only an hour, hour-and-half. One that’s not from this country, or I’ve never seen and they’re likely not going to tour anymore, or it’s a really unique show? I’m more willing to travel far, potentially even another country or continent if I can afford it. The farther I go the more I want to make a big trip of it: at least a weekend if not even a week or more if I were going to Europe or something. The closest I’ve come to that, though, was making a long weekend to Washington, D.C. during the cherry blossom festival to see Muse. That was about a 4 hour drive away.

  • MorrisonMotel6@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I live in a city where most popular bands tour, but I definitely would travel internationally to see a show just to make a week out of it. I was considering going to RAtM when they were in Europe, because I couldn’t get good seats in the US. I definitely would have gone if I could have gotten better seats in Europe. Alas, couldn’t get good seats there either