• 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    40
    ·
    2 months ago

    Jeez, that’s a lot of words you needed to make a clown out of yourself, just because you are pissed by objective fact.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I think you’re pissed at the objective fact that 12/433 is fucking nothing and your “good guy with a gun” argument is a pathetic farce, so you’re trying muddy the waters by shifting the argument to a ridiculous, unfounded, unfalsifiable notion that any of the 42 subduers might’ve had literally anything to do with “good guys” having firearms.

      • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think you’re pissed at the objective fact that 12/433 is fucking nothing and your “good guy with a gun” argument

        There is nothing in what I said that would imply what side of “good guy with a gun” argument I am on and there is nothing in the data that says anything about whether the 42 people had a gun.

        My point is this is terrible and confusing representation of the data, as is often the case in any “data is beautiful” community.

        But keep kicking around mad that the version that supports your narrative is not the only possible one :D

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, so terrible and confusing that they didn’t mention guns in branches that don’t have anything to do with guns outside of a gun fetishist’s fanfiction.

          • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            2 months ago

            branches that don’t have anything to do with guns

            Branch that doesn’t involve shooting the attacker.

            Keep trying. You will not get there, but at least you tried.

        • Lev_Astov@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Thank you for standing up to the slavering morons around here about bad statistical graphics.

          All I’m getting out of this is that police are, in fact less than 50% effective, so we’d better plan on dealing with it ourselves.