aPirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 3 months agoGoogle Asks Court to Gut "Kitchen Sink" Lawsuit Claiming it Profits From Piracy * TorrentFreaktorrentfreak.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up160arrow-down11cross-posted to: legalnews@lemmy.zip
arrow-up159arrow-down1external-linkGoogle Asks Court to Gut "Kitchen Sink" Lawsuit Claiming it Profits From Piracy * TorrentFreaktorrentfreak.comaPirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square6fedilinkcross-posted to: legalnews@lemmy.zip
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down5·3 months agoInvalid grammar in the headline. “It” is Google not the lawsuit as regular grammar rules would dictate.
minus-squaredysprosium@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·3 months agoWouldn’t it then still be weird, so “the lawsuit benefits from piracy”?
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoYes. Although that is valid and could be an actual thing. I don’t know but I think US law “entitles” copyright holders to the value of pirated things and then some. Which technically profits from piracy.
Invalid grammar in the headline. “It” is Google not the lawsuit as regular grammar rules would dictate.
Wouldn’t it then still be weird, so “the lawsuit benefits from piracy”?
Yes. Although that is valid and could be an actual thing. I don’t know but I think US law “entitles” copyright holders to the value of pirated things and then some. Which technically profits from piracy.