• Bonehead@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    And if they did that, the admins would just boot the mods and bring in scabs anyways. There is no way that any continuing protests won’t end like that at this point. Admins have made it very clear…get with the program, or fuck off.

    • eee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would the admins do that? The mods would have reopened the sub and followed the rules.

      Unless the admins lay down a new set of rules… in which case the mods can lazily comply with it again, and on and on

      • UnverifiedAPK@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Lack of moderation/failure to moderate”. The admins have banned plenty of subs for it in the past, replacing the mods is actually a measured approach for them.

      • Bonehead@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because they already did it to r /interestingasfuck and many others. Some even in spite of user protests.

        • eee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          that’s because they all drastically changed the rules. I’m talking about quiet quitting. That’s harder to spot.