I was going to drop my kid off at school when a dog ran between two cars and my back tire ran over a portion of the dog. I slowed down and stopped not knowing what to do and watched the dog hop up and hobble away into an adjoining back yard. What seemed to be the owner followed the dog into the back yard. I immediately pulled over but had to roll up my windows as my dog was riding along. I waited a few houses away not really knowing how to react and asking my kid what she thought I should do. When the dog quickly wandered off she wasn’t sure how I should act either.

What do I do? My initial hesitancy is tied to the dog quickly walking away into what looked like it’s home and the owner slowly following it away. I’m concerned of getting into the middle of a highly emotional situation if the dog needs to go to the vet. If the dog lay lifeless I would have had no issue with getting out and consoling as needed. Is there a difference? I think also am concerned I’ll get told I’m responsible and need to help cover any vet costs.

  • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I agree that it should have been done straight away but perfect shouldn’t be the enemy of good, going back to check up on it is better than not doing anything.

    This is the part I disagree with.

    Stopping, debating with to do with the child then going home to post on Lemmy is ridiculous.

    Also OP had their own dog, I wonder what they would do if the situation was reversed.

    • MediumGray@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Again, I don’t think your actually understanding what is being said. Yes, that is ridiculous. We agree. However what has been done has already been done.

      Time as we humans experience it moves only in one direction. We can not go back to change that. Time travel does not exist. So the question is what should be done going forward.

      Attempting even the least harm reduction, while inferior to avoiding harm altogether, is better than no harm reduction. Should OP have done much better? Yes. Should they do something now rather than nothing at all? Also yes.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Stopping, debating with to do with the child then going home to post on Lemmy is ridiculous.

      I absolutely agree. The right thing to do here is the hard and scary thing, but it is still the right thing. And the right thing is clear.

      The thing that really gets me is the parent asking the child what the right move is. Fuck.