• akash_rawal@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t get it, how would a database container run your unit tests? And unless you know some secret option to stop the database after, say, it is idle for a few seconds, it will continue running.

    The purpose is to test database dependent code by spinning up a real database and run your code against that.

    • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Ah! That’s what I didn’t understand. So its not a container for executing unit tests. Its a container for dependencies to support unit tests. That is not clear from the readme unless I missed something

      edit - the title could be “Self terminating containers for real world dependencies to support your unit tests”

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        This feels more like an integration test than a unit test to me. Maybe that’s not an important distinction to make, but it feels like it would also help communicate intent.

        • Adam@doomscroll.n8e.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m reading this scratching my head going “If your unit tests need a database they ain’t a unit test”.

      • akash_rawal@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thanks man, my brain was short-circuited on Testcontainers so I couldn’t write better. Also I am stealing the title.

    • Miaou@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      So it’s not for unit tests, that’s where the confusion stems