• Estiar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    “biological male” is if anything bad description of reality. A trans woman who has been on hormone therapy for a couple of years is biologically closer to cisgender women than cisgender men. And even more so if they’ve had surgeries. But usually people who use that term don’t care and lump everyone who was assigned male at birth into that category.

    I could attribute this term to ignorance because it sounds reasonable, but it’s far too often used to exclude trans women from spaces that other women belong

    • FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s a beautiful way of seeing it indeed, you convinced me

      My point was just to say that in very specific cases it can be used to make it clear that the person is born male but I guess the cisgender and transgender terms are now relatively well known

      It’s still easier to explain some things with this word, but I wouldn’t use it socially of course

      You nailed the problem: it is often used for bad reasons and thus people categorize people saying this word, which is highly invalid imo and shouldn’t be criminalized this way when the context is appropriate

      But yea, now even scientific literature pretty much abandoned this word