• Xcf456@lemmy.nzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Other than three properties held in their names, the Donkins’ ownership is largely held under various companies, including C & J Donkin Enterprises Ltd, Tall Poppies Trustee Company Ltd, and Jardine Holdings Ltd, and the more creatively named I M Broke 2 Ltd, Filthy Rich Ltd and Who Cares Ltd.

    I’m so glad Filthy Rich Ltd and Who Cares Ltd will get their interest deductability back so they can gobble up the rest of the houses in Ōpōtiki a bit faster

    • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually fucking funny they used those names, they had to know it would make people like you angry.

      • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whilst mildly funny, it does show a level of cuntyness. I’m a little interested but not enough to look, I wonder when each company was created do the “funny” names come later?

        It is not really what you want in the people who are housing others.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, that many rental properties, and not one tenancy tribunal ruling against them? Clearly they’re doing this by the book.

          And despite this, they’re still the villains of the piece merely for being landlords for some.

          • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I read the article and really only the clickbait headline paints them as the villain, though that does colour the perception of the reader for the whole article.

            I found it basically bashing speculators and contrasting them with investors, which I tend to agree with. If you are treating it as a business and treating your people well then your business will likely grow as a result. My read would be that these people are doing well, precisely because they are doing a good job.

            I did find it funny that the 8 cases with the tenancy tribunal since 2000 when they owned 11 properties and now when they own 53, some of which will be multi-tenancy properties, shows that they are probably quite good at it. I’m speculating on that, but it seems like a low number considering the number of potential tenancies they have been involved with over the intervening 23 years.

            From a business risk point of view…I wouldn’t put all my eggs in one basket like that, if a major event happened in that area they would be extremely exposed.

      • Xcf456@lemmy.nzOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wow you’re honestly like all the repetitive nastiness of the old NZ subreddit rolled into one. It’s incredibly boring

      • Hades@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Kinda like how the hexbear trolls knew their behaviour would rile you up.

        Honestly your shtick is a bit dull.

          • Hades@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, they were being dicks. All I’m saying is, it seems like you’re all for trolling people you disagree with, but actually started a movement to block people from here because they trolled you.

            • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              There’s a key difference between winding up one specific person, and flooding an entire thread with shitty gifs. I’m happy to actually engage with people willing to have an open discussion, but the person I originally replied to had no such intention.

              Also they’re kinda insufferable.