• SbisasCostlyTurnover@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, for a start it’s a solution without a problem. We don’t really have an issue with voter fraud in the UK. All this has done is disenfranchise people who could previously vote without needing an often costly ID.

        • WellThisIsNew@fjdk.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It costs time and effort, something that disabled people often have less of.

          Voter fraud is extremely low in the UK, and most of what does occur isn’t stopped by these changes (the most common type is, for example, parents submitting a postal vote on behalf of their (18+) children without asking them), So here’s a question for you:

          If the number of people disuaded from voting due to the new ID laws significantly outnumber* the amount of fraud that’s prevented by this law, was the law a positive change?

          *To the point that it has a larger effect on election outcome

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            We’ve had voter I.D. here in Northern Ireland for ages and I haven’t heard any complaints

    • merridew@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You give your name & address at your local polling place, and it is checked off by a polling officer against the Electoral Roll. So yes, you could pretend to be someone else, but they would need to have not already voted. And you could only do it once per polling station, because you’ll be recognised by the polling officers. And for what?