City of Ottawa staff are defending the graphic nature of a new online advertisement aimed at discouraging jaywalking on city streets, saying it is part of a campaign focusing on behaviours will "depict the serious nature of road safety and lead to greater awareness to all road users of their responsibilities."

“We continually flame road violence as an outcome of personal choices yet we all know very well it’s the result of our cities choices,” Tom Flood said on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

“This is an unacceptable ad; victim blaming road violence is not the city I believe in,” architect Toon Dreessen said.

…

Statistics provided by Gonthier shows 25 per cent of all fatal and major injury collisions on Ottawa’s roads involve pedestrians. The memo provided data on collisions between 2017 and 2021 on Ottawa roads:

  • 29 per cent of fatal and major injury collisions involving a pedestrian occurred when a pedestrian was crossing a road midblock (away from an intersection)
  • 23 per cent of fatal and major injury collisions involving a pedestrian occurred when a pedestrian with the right-of-way was struck at an intersection by a left turning driver
  • 11 per cent of fatal and major injury collisions involving a pedestrian occurred when a pedestrian who did not have the right-of-way was struck by a vehicle travelling straight through an intersection
  • masterspace@lemmy.caEnglish
    11·
    1 year ago

    If they are so frail that they won’t survive a trip to the nearest bus stop they should take an ambulance to the hospital for hospice care.

    This is abelist nonsense. You will at some point in your life be in that state, as will your parents, significant others and friends.

    If the weather is that inclement, chances are that their oh-so-important hockey practice will be canceled that day.

    Lmao, no hockey practices don’t get cancelled because of snow, and no it’s not possible to bike through the snow with equipment, especially if they’re your kids.

    And learn to read the fucking context, this is one specific example amongst countless other examples in millions of people’s lives.

    You didn’t. I was presenting a common example of today’s car culture

    You were making wild assumptions about me to ride your prefluffed hate boner.

    Did I say the opposite?

    The original person who I was replying to that was the basis for this whole comment chain did, yes:

    You don’t need cars to move people. That’s a design choice that cities make.

    I don’t disagree with any of what you wrote in the last section, I’m pushing back against the car free enthusiasts who make us all look stupid when they make claims like we don’t need any cars.

    • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
      11·
      1 year ago

      Personal insults do are not conducive to civil conversation. Perhaps you would feel better after going out for a walk or a bike ride. Have a great day!