• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      If it is a person, then yes, it could be considered a rapist, and subject to forcible removal at the mother’s will. If it is not a person, it is merely an unexpected growth, and subject to forcible removal at the mother’s will.

      The ridiculousness of the former scenario tells us that, for purposes of deciding whether the mother is entitled to remove it, the fetus should not be considered a person.

    • S_204@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Come on. Have you seen what’s going on on college campuses right now? I’ve heard far less serious things being said with absolute sincerity.

      We’re reaching the point where victimhood is the only trait people aspire to achieve.

    • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not a child. A child is defined as having been born. It’s a fetus. A parasite.