• dustojnikhummer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not necessairly (well, goodbye to Starfield Script Extender in that case). But I think it’s more that Gamebryo can’t integrate Denuvo lol

        • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It would also be unplayably slow. Bethesda games aren’t known for performance even without Denuvo slowing them down.

            • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Unless I’m mistaken, Denuvo constantly encrypts and decrypts everything in the process’ memory, including executable code, in order to conceal it. There is no way to do that without massive performance overhead.

              • dustojnikhummer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                There are uncracked Denuvo games to this day that don’t have performance issues. Not everyone is incompetent in implementing it. That doesn’t mean I’m defending it (but Reddit/Lemmy will like to take any sort of non-attack as defense sooooo), I’m just saying that there are Denuvo games that don’t suffer performance issues.

    • dustojnikhummer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bethesda Game Studios games don’t have DRM like Denuvo. BGS and Bethesda Softworks are two different entities. ID, MachineGames and other Zenimax studios tend to have DRM, not BGS.

      On the other hand, didn’t Denuvo come out after Fallout 4 launched? So what would they even protect, 76?