literature.cafe
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz to Standardization@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 years ago

BREAKING: The USA is switching to METRIC!

piped.video

external-link
message-square
19
link
fedilink
1
external-link

BREAKING: The USA is switching to METRIC!

piped.video

Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz to Standardization@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
19
link
fedilink
Piped
piped.video
external-link
An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube frontend which is efficient by design.
  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    In a sane world, we’d be base 10. I don’t think it’ll happen.

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Hey, what’s wrong with base RNG? Sure keeps things interesting.

    • LemoineFairclough@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Base 6 would be better and maybe even base 12 could be too. Luckily the United States customary units already use a lot of numbers with more useful prime factorization than 10 like 4 and 3 and even 120.

      • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Babylonians were obsessed with divisibility, so they went with a base 60 system. That’s why we still have 60 minutes 60 and seconds. Also the 360 degrees of a circle fits that ideology, because 6*60=360.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Was it really base-60? Like “10” in Babylonian was 60 and they had 59 individual symbols for the digits lower than that? If so, that’s a lot of digits to learn.

          • LemoineFairclough@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            To represent a number using Babylonian Cuneiform Numbers, you choose a symbol to represent 10 ((2*2*2)+2) and a symbol to represent 1, and you create them combined in groups that are summed together to represent numbers up to 59 (10+10+10+10+10+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1). When one group is to the left of another, the group to the left represents a number that is 60 times greater than it would if the group to its right hadn’t been created. A symbol representing a group that sums to 0 was sometimes used.

            The Numberphile channel created videos on this topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RR3zzQP3bII https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9m2jck1f90

            • merc@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Interesting, thanks, I’ll watch the video.

Standardization@sh.itjust.works

standardization@sh.itjust.works

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !standardization@sh.itjust.works

Professionals have standards! Community for all proponents, defenders and junkies of the Metric (International) system, the ISO standards (including ISO 8601) and other ways of standardization or regulation!

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 1 user / week
  • 1 user / month
  • 1 user / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 454 subscribers
  • 7 Posts
  • 54 Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • glaber@sh.itjust.works
  • glaber@lemm.ee
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org