• Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    When did attorneys become qualified to determine appropriate treatments for medical diagnoses?

    • JaymesRS
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      If Alito and Thomas can master the field of history in such a short time, what makes you think they can’t do the same with the field of medicine‽

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      To opponents it’s not a medical diagnosis, it’s a choice. Same for anything other than cis people, except the notion of people transitioning is far, far worse.

      They believe that a person chooses to be gay, but at least that choice is reversible, fixable. If it’s a choice, it’s not a choice a child can make. And teens are certainly impressionable.

      Once you truly internalize where conservatives are coming from, it pretty much explains all these views. Almost forgot, we gotta throw in the child molester thing. What a win that propaganda turned out to be.

      We can talk all night about how stupid these views are. Turned a friend around years ago by simply asking, “If it’s a choice we all have, when did you make yours? Because Wonder Woman comics got me a hardon when I was 5.”

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Thanks for this comment, I hadn’t thought about it this way before. I had realised about how being gay is framed as a thing you do rather than a thing you are, because I have a friend who is an ex-benedictine monk, and they explained about how their vow of chastity meant they were basically “one of the good ones”. A large part of why they left was because their rhetoric was “everyone has sinful desires in them and turning away from those is an important challenge”, but the unspoken part was that his gayness made his desires extra bad, like there was just some innately bad thing in him.

        And of course they would apply this same logic to gender. As you say, it makes more sense when you try to see it from their angle. I think that’s important to do if we hope to ever refute them