• Echinoderm@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    But quoting it implies it’s an invalid claim.

    Interesting. I read the quotes as meaning: someone else said it, it’s not just some opinion we made up. In this case, it was reporting the coroner’s official finding.

    In other words, I understood it to be reinforcing the claim rather than invalidating it.

    • Ilandar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes, that is how they use quotes. Without them it would appear as though the The Guardian was making its own assessment of the system, which it is not.

      People need to read beyond the headline and understand how it relates to the content of the article itself. I’ve seen a few threads on reddit recently where people were outraged about headlines and assumed the article was contradicting their beliefs when it was actually validating them. An example is this article by The Guardian, which is about the correlation between generational wealth inequality and gaps in life satisfaction between generations. /r/Australia was absolutely incensed by the headline and most of the comments in the thread were along the lines of “FEELS LIKE?! HOW DARE THE MEDIA GASLIGHT ME!!!” despite the fact that the article was about how young people were feeling and was arguing the exact thing everyone assumed it wasn’t.