• ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      1 year ago

      You shouldn’t be downvoted for thinking this. Many people do which is why this post exists to begin with.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      1 year ago

      He sued them in order to be able to call himself that.

      But no matter how much money he throws at it, he can’t change a definition.

          • Strangle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            You don’t think donations pour into anti-racism non-profit groups?

            Who do you think works to change these definitions and why don’t you think they’re funded?

            Do you think these things happen organically?

            • irmoz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              What does anti racism have to do with anything?

              This supposed to be some kinda dogwhistle?

              • Strangle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                1 year ago

                Racism is one of the words that used to mean something different than what it means today.

                Racism used to mean believing races are superior or inferior to each other. Today, racism means “power + prejudice” or some variation.

                Try to keep up, man. We are talking about words changing definitions. ‘Founder’ was the example. I’m adding more, like ‘racism’

                • orrk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Today, racism means “power + prejudice”

                  no, that’s something some fringe group uses, it’s literally some micro fringe “SJW” and Alt-Right who push this shit

      • ratman150@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Worth noting that Steve Jobs didn’t really found Apple either but rather used his friend to do all the leg work and made a brand out of that.

        It’s actually a really sad origin story if you look into it.

        • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think Woz would disagree with that, and from everything I’ve read about that time from him, he was genuinely having a great time. Jobs did screw Woz out of money from Atari, which he was hurt by when finding out, but they were collaborative in founding Apple.

          • spencerwi@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Notably, Woz found out decades later, after Steve was dead already, when he was interviewed by someone who told him the whole story.

            I like to think that if Jobs were alive today, the general public would see him as the Elon Musk type that he was. Instead, he died before his cult of personality could properly sour on him.

            • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah even in his final hours things started souring, with how he eschewed modern cancer medicine in favor of his weird all fruit diet. I imagine if he had actually beaten his cancer, it would have resulted in a huge ego boost, and further souring still.