• RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Is everyone forgetting we have already fought one war on our northern border? Shit happens. What if Canada went nuts and elected some narcissistic tv host that wears a diaper as a leader and they formed a cult by accident and it’s members started shooting people across the border. You would want a contingency plan in place to handle that, ya know?

    • Ertebolle@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That was more than 200 years ago - 2/3 of the states didn’t exist yet - and it ended in a mostly pointless stalemate.

      • flying_monkies@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That was more than 200 years ago

        Your point being what?

        When your neighbors to the north call it “The Geneva Suggestions” tell me you’re not going to have constant contingency plans for the day they stop saying “sorry”. 😁

      • nicktron@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Is this the war of 1812 where Canada burned down your first White House? That pointless stalemate?

        • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          British troops did that, specifically British troops who had never set foot in British North America, let alone Canada, which didn’t exist. And yes, any war that ends in status que ante bellum is pointless.

          • DragonTypeWyvern
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sorta… Wars can be about more than territory, which is all that term refers to.

            America achieved all its stated goals for the war, which didn’t include “Actually this is mostly just a war of conquest we hope you’re too busy to defend against.” It just conveniently doesn’t mention a couple had already happened, and it would have been gauche to admit we really just wanted the territory.

        • rambaroo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They burned down the white house because they were forced to leave the city. People always act like it was some huge victory for them but they always leave out the fact that they couldn’t actually hold territory in the US, and the war ended with a major US victory at New Orleans.

          At the same time the US invasion of Canada failed and they couldn’t hold territory there either. Obviously. That’s called a stalemate.

          Just a dumb point to bring up since we can all see that DC doesn’t belong to the UK today. And Toronto doesn’t belong to the US. So yes it was a stalemate, without the sarcastic quotation marks.

      • roguetrick@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        ended in a mostly pointless stalemate

        They fought it to beat France, they ended up beating France. I think it’s safe to say they won.

  • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I assume the US military has an invasion plan on the books for about every country on the face of the earth. They gotta spend all the trillions of dollars of black money on something.

  • English Mobster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think my favorite part of this is looking at the Canadian and British plans for if the US invaded Canada.

    Canada’s plan was to pre-emptively invade the US, knowing that Canada wouldn’t be able to hold the territory long-term. They would go as deep as they could before they started to fall back as slowly as possible, hoping to buy time for the UK to sail over and invade the mainland US.

    The UK’s plan was to abandon Canada and just let the Americans take over. Losing Canada was seen as “non-fatal” to the UK, and it was believed that sending an invasion force to fight back would hurt the UK more than if they just abandoned Canada’s defense entirely.

    • rambaroo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Damn that’s fucked up. I feel bad for the Canadians reading that. Imagine fighting desperately for your independence just to have your big bro stab you in the back like that.

      • bouh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like what happened to Poland in ww2 basically. The difference was that they were already fighting with their allies.

    • roguetrick@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They would attack targets like New Orleans and let American infantry try to bog down in occupying Canada. They’d still invade, just with the goal of a status quo ante bellum by targeting key US ports.

    • guyrocket@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I drove near the Canadian border there were intersections the just had a sign with an arrow that said Canada.

      So just go north and watch for the Canada signs.

  • n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They didn’t need to do anything, our politicians started to deepthroat theirs. Look at Definbaker, scrapped the world’s most advanced jet program so the US could give us some Bulmark missiles as defense from Russia and guess what, WE NEVER GOT THEM. 1995 we sold CN Rail to an American. Fast cowards to The Harper regime, he gave the US army promission to be used in Canada if we ask for help, sold of the wheat boards assets to an American for $1 even though it was worth billions. CRA on multiple occasions have let the American company KPMG help the richest Canadians avoid taxes.

    We may as well be part of America except going to a hospital won’t bankrupt ya here

  • teft@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would assume all sovereign countries would have plans like these as contingencies of contingencies. You would want a plan already made in case some coup happens in your neighboring country and they threaten your sovereignty.

  • Blastasaurus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey remember when you tried that last time and your precious Whitehouse got burnt down?

    • DragonTypeWyvern
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good luck importing some English Redcoats this time, future states.

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lmao the most recent Canadian W is from the 18th century. Are you implying that the modern Canadians military and modern US military are equals?

  • kakes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I appreciate that the prairie provinces are just “Ehh, just go generally north.”

    Also, scary thing is, that’s exactly how to do it.

  • evranch@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Today all they would have to do is stand at the border and yell “We’ll give you American citizenship and you can trade your $CAD for $USD at par”

    I’ll go fetch the white flags

  • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s the source for this? Is it anything other than CCP propaganda intended to drive a wedge between the US and Canada?

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, maoists in China created a detailed invasion plan for the US to invade Canada, infiltrated the US government and then had them “declassified” in 1974 in order to create a mild temporary tension between the two close knit NATO allies.

      • CIWS-30@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, in the 1920’s to boot. If B-movie (or nowadays just any movie studio) were on here, they’d take what you just wrote, add time travel to it and make it into a movie without giving you credit. And they’d probably find some way to use AI in it too.

    • BerryB1ue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      The USA had a standing policy of having a war plan ready for every contingency. I suggest looking up “War Plan Red” on wikipedia, its a good read!

      • DragonTypeWyvern
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Including:

        Alien invasions. Including variables for infiltration and technological advantage.

        Zombie outbreaks, magical or biological in nature.

        Fighting a war against every nation on Earth at the same time.

        All kinds of civil war scenarios.

    • TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lmao wut?

      You have limitless information at your fingertips and you refuse to do an iota of research before jumping on “China bad”?

      Fuck China, but for the love of God… literally attempt googling something next time 🤦‍♂️

      • RubberDucky@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I like how people forget that almost every countries military has plans to invade/defend their neighbourhood, better to have plans ready for that time then not having any plan.

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would it be? It’s always good to have contingency plans. This became even more clear in the 30s when political instability of rife everywhere. Never knew what your neighbors were going to do in a decade.