• toasteecup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    nobody’s safety is in jeopardy

    You know, except for those abuse victims whose pictures are being spread around lemmy. Just sayin’

    • EhForumUser@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The theory behind why CSAM is illegal is that if someone is willing to pay for CSAM, the idea is that it incentivizes production of even more CSAM content to receive more payment. That incentivized additional production means even more abuse. A perfectly reasonable take and something that I think can be demonstrated.

      But why would you accidentally seeing CSAM prompt you to give payment to create that incentivization? Are you worried that you’re a closeted pedophile that will be ready to shower those who record such content to see more and more as soon as you get your first taste?

    • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I thought it was pretty apparent we were talking about Lemmy, but okay.

      The statements were about the Lemmy devs can and/or should be doing for safety. They simply do not have the power to stop child abuse by developing a social media platform. So then the safety in question must be the safety of people using Lemmy, because the Lemmy devs have some direct power over that.

      I’m sure you feel very morally aloof with your righteous retort, though.