• conciselyverbose@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean, it definitely helps. The production quality is insane. But the fact that the choices (or mistakes) have actual real impacts on the game going forward are as big as far as I’m concerned. I ended up with my hand being forced into combat early that made an encounter with a potential party member immediately hostile. That sucks, especially since I wasn’t trying to do what happened in the earlier encounter. But in terms of a world feeling alive, having it actually react to what you do is pretty damn significant (unless “you’re small and irrelevant” is intentional).

    • Talaraine@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s time developers come to grips with the fact that making choices matter is what makes it a successful game. I’m tired of storylines that don’t make any sense except to give you a world to kill people in. Sorry folks, lore is important and that takes writers.

      Stop treating them like afterthoughts.

      • Wooly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It definitely depends on the game, I’m perfectly happy with a game that has a story to tell, and tells it well. Not everything needs to have branching options and 50+ hour playtime. Some of the best stories I’ve played are short and railroady, WaW and BO1 campaing’s are fantastically interesting and you don’t make a single choice in them.

        • AZmaybe9@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Remnant 2 is brilliant at this and bad at this at the same time! The in-world stories that are told along with the environments are absolutely STUNNING! Everything clicks together so well and a slightly different story is told when re-rolling the map!

          Main story cutscenes tell the worst story I’ve ever seen executed. (Worse than Monster Hunter World’s Handler story stuff) I’m glad they’re skippable on another run. Because literally everything is is some of the most classic gaming experience one could have.

          • Talaraine@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            There was so much promise in their lore!! I liked N’Erud the best but the rest didn’t really lead anywhere other than that you visited, you did something notable, and then you left. Nothing really changed.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would say if it is all about the gameplay, like Serious Sam or Doom, then the story doesn’t need to be that important and dexisions don’t need to matter. But if the story is front and center, like Baldur’s Gate and most similar RPGs, the story and how choices impact the story need to be well done so it doesn’t feel on rails and replaying it is enjoyable.

      • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I personally am perfectly happy with a game that’s all about mechanics and gameplay.

        But the extremely rare game that actually is well written is nice to see.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think the lack of choices is necessarily a bad thing. The original Doom had no story choices (it barely even had a story) and it’s still pretty good even by today’s standards. Half-Life 1 and 2 pretty much had no story choices as well (there was 1 at the end of the first game) and the first one in particular is considered revolutionizing how stories are presented in games.

        What I do think is an issue is when the game presents you with a choice that doesn’t matter. Bioshock Infinite is the first that comes to mind as the game puts quite a few options front and center, but really none of them matter (except the very last one) and the game even implies that the choices deliberately don’t matter because “constants and variables”. Thus those choices, at least for me, detracted from the story because there was never no need to make me make a choice.

        In that sense I agree that choices should matter, but I think a better wording is that if you’re going to have choices make them matter or don’t have choices in the first place.

      • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It gets super confusing when you do stuff in the wrong order though. Missing a clue because you didn’t read the right book or something but then randomly finding the end of the quest and everyone is talking like we know all about it.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Usually it recognizes it. Sometimes it doesn’t though. I’d hope those instances get patches eventually. Even worse though is when something triggers for something you didn’t even do. I’ve had a party member get angry at me for something that I did the opposite of. It’s a pretty solid game, but it’s not totally bug free, which is expected with so much complexity. Who knows, it could have just been a cosmic ray that flipped a bit and not even their fault (though I doubt it).

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You also miss out on Minthara? I’ve been hearing she’s great but I merced her ass