• PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yeah most people don’t care to maintain a local music library. It’s a lot of work and compared to streaming services that do it for you this offers no real benefit. If you listen to lots of new/different music all the time, streaming is actually far cheaper.

    • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s cheaper because the band doesn’t get paid as much. The streaming service keeps most of the meager pay.

      • PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        People make up for it by buying merch or going to shows. Margins on those things are much better for the artists.

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        In every service I know of, the platform takes a minority of revenue

    • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      “It is a lot of work”? I don’t know, for me it always seemed far more convenient than being locked to a single service, single player app and following restrictions.