• lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m reading a book from the 30s and it has phrases like: “in the time after the war”. It’s written in 1937 and hits differently in hindsight.

      • lugal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes, the “second war to end all wars” and the “cold war that only gets hot in the periphery”

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nukes are about the only reason we haven’t made it a trilogy.

        It’ll be the last one in the franchise if they do.

      • devfuuu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Typical holywood and their sequels. Just pray they don’t remember to retrofit a prequel in there.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        WWII wasn’t even really a sequel - it’s more of a classic reboot. It’s almost exactly the same story as the first one, just with a few twists like Japan and the atomic bomb ending thrown in.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I think you’re underplaying the sequel aspects. Russia was one of the antagonists in the first installment, began as an antagonist in the second, but flipped to protagonist ally in the first act. Also in the first installment the Ottoman Empire was an antagonist ally, where Turkey was neutral through all of WWII. Finally, China was an ally in WWII and huge victim of the Japanese , but underwent a revolution joining with Russia to become the primary antagonists in the third installment “Cold War”.

      • lugal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        He also talks about unemployment rates in Britain and “unless a war is coming soon” many people will stay underfed. Maybe the British proletariat is behind WWII?

        Edit: Since I’m downvoted: the last sentence was a joke, obviously