Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 6 months agoStop Arming Cartels Act makes it unlawful to make, sell, possess a rifle ‘capable of firing .50-caliber ammunition’www.wavy.comexternal-linkmessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up1126arrow-down19
arrow-up1117arrow-down1external-linkStop Arming Cartels Act makes it unlawful to make, sell, possess a rifle ‘capable of firing .50-caliber ammunition’www.wavy.comRapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 6 months agomessage-square73fedilink
minus-squareneuropean@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up7·6 months agoI get it, but I think muzzle loafers deserve an exception. I don’t care who you are, if you bring a muzzle loader to a fight you deserve to use it*. *so long as it isn’t a track-mounted muzzle loader
minus-squarePsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoMuzzle loaders aren’t firearms, tho. Or at least fly under vastly different regs.
minus-squareEvacuateSoul@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 months agoBlack powder weapons aren’t legally considered firearms. You can order them in the mail with no background check.
minus-squareEl Barto@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoWhat are they considered if not firearms, then? Genuine question…
minus-squareLrdThndr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-26 months ago“Firearm” is a legal definition. It’s not that they’re considered something else, it’s just that they don’t fit the legal definition of a “firearm”. Don’t look at me. Look at the ATF and their weird-ass arbitrary rules and definitions.
minus-squareBgugi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoNot the ATF, Congress who wrote the laws.
Even black powder?
I get it, but I think muzzle loafers deserve an exception. I don’t care who you are, if you bring a muzzle loader to a fight you deserve to use it*.
*so long as it isn’t a track-mounted muzzle loader
Muzzle loaders aren’t firearms, tho. Or at least fly under vastly different regs.
Black powder weapons aren’t legally considered firearms. You can order them in the mail with no background check.
What are they considered if not firearms, then? Genuine question…
“Firearm” is a legal definition. It’s not that they’re considered something else, it’s just that they don’t fit the legal definition of a “firearm”.
Don’t look at me. Look at the ATF and their weird-ass arbitrary rules and definitions.
Thank you.
Not the ATF, Congress who wrote the laws.