• OnePhoenix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t know if what I do is the right way around this but, as stated Proton will reject disposable verification emails and you cannot use another proton account to verify a new one.

    My workaround for this is to verify proton with a Tutanota account which is also created with as little to no identifiable information as possible.

    TLDR: Proton accepts Tuta emails for verification and Tuta emails can be created anonymously.

    • CaptObvious
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Which leads to the next logical question: Why not just use Tuta in the first place?

      • OnePhoenix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        Valid point. I do prefer the UI with Proton, I find it nicer to click through. Also, Tuta usually makes you wait 2-3 days before you can use it - not a big deal really, unless you’re trying to sign up for something new.

        • CaptObvious
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          There was no wait period when I signed up for their service, but that was several years ago. Things always change.

        • CaptObvious
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Always good advice. But at least make the second basket one that you can trust. Proton ain’t it.

        • CaptObvious
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Other than not requiring a second email address linked to their service, being covered by German rather than Swiss law, actually fighting back against information requests, and not sucking up to the Chinese Communist Party, Tuta is probably fairly similar. Those differences, though, are persuasive.