@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 2 months agoOur bffsmander.xyzimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1309arrow-down17
arrow-up1302arrow-down1imageOur bffsmander.xyz@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squarePatapon EnjoyerlinkfedilinkEnglish33•edit-22 months agoStatistitians are good people, though I need more data points to say anything conclusively
minus-square@marcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish6•2 months agoJust to point out, but you need to make sure your data is unbiased much more than you need a lot of points.
minus-square@merari42@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish4•2 months agoCan you at least say how your prior belief distribution has shifted or been reaffirmed given the observed data points?
Statistitians are good people, though I need more data points to say anything conclusively
Just to point out, but you need to make sure your data is unbiased much more than you need a lot of points.
Can you at least say how your prior belief distribution has shifted or been reaffirmed given the observed data points?
That would be pretty Bayesed