• Flying SquidM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        Once again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.

        • diprount_tomato
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -111 months ago

          Unlike “Why weed should be legal”, a news article cited in this same post

          • Flying SquidM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            311 months ago

            I did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn’t relevant.

            Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?

              • Flying SquidM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                311 months ago

                You could, but that would be another bit of dishonesty because I have not tied you to anything. So now you have shown yourself to be a throughly dishonest person.

                • diprount_tomato
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -211 months ago

                  You have definitely tied me to dishonesty for citing a source you didn’t like despite it describing the symptoms of drug withdrawal in marijuana users

                  • Flying SquidM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    411 months ago

                    Yes, I have tied you to dishonesty. Because you are dishonest since what you did was dishonestly tie me to a post I didn’t make.

                    I never said that you tied me to dishonesty.

                    So now you have proved not only that you are dishonest but that you don’t properly read what I wrote.

                    I think we’re done here. You can have the last word and get your dopamine hit from one last downvote.