• Melllvar
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -12 months ago

    That’s a separate issue that could not be addressed with this kind of law anyway.

    • TheHarpyEagle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      How so? If you’re concerned about propaganda, require every company operating within the US to show users exactly what data is collected and allow them to delete any or all of it as desired. Show users to the technical extent possible what data has connected them to suggested videos or ads. Put the power of users’ hands to understand and control how they are targeted.

      • Melllvar
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        require every company operating within the US to show users exactly what data is collected and allow them to delete any or all of it as desired

        That would be a very different kind of law from the one we’re talking about.

        • TheHarpyEagle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          My point is, why isn’t that the law were making? Does it not address the same problem?

          • Melllvar
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            Not exactly the same problem. In the same way that gun control doesn’t address the problem of hostile foreign militaries. Yes, both involve guns, but the laws and policies that address one are inapplicable and inappropriate to the other.

            The law in question addresses the problem of foreign adversaries having easy access to manipulate US public opinion. The law you suggest addresses the problem of advertisers having that access. Both are serious concerns, both need to be addressed, but they are not the same problem and the solutions are markedly different.