canpolat@programming.dev to Actually Useful AI@programming.devEnglish · 1 年前AI-generated articles prompt Wikipedia to downgrade CNET’s reliability ratingarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square14linkfedilinkarrow-up1341arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1341arrow-down1external-linkAI-generated articles prompt Wikipedia to downgrade CNET’s reliability ratingarstechnica.comcanpolat@programming.dev to Actually Useful AI@programming.devEnglish · 1 年前message-square14linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvernlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down4·1 年前If it was actually AI (or good) it’d be different. I’m ashamed of millennial gamers for not forcing the terminology to be VI. Did we learn nothing from Mass Effect?
minus-squarefunnystuff97@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·edit-21 年前It’s a marketing thing. Calling LLM’s “AI” was a very intentional move, to evoke that sense of hyperintelligence. Whether it’s truly an artifical intelligence up for debate, but calling them AI absolutely helped them gain attention (good and bad). Also, obligatory “shut up Avina”.
If it was actually AI (or good) it’d be different.
I’m ashamed of millennial gamers for not forcing the terminology to be VI. Did we learn nothing from Mass Effect?
It’s a marketing thing. Calling LLM’s “AI” was a very intentional move, to evoke that sense of hyperintelligence. Whether it’s truly an artifical intelligence up for debate, but calling them AI absolutely helped them gain attention (good and bad).
Also, obligatory “shut up Avina”.