• @TIMMAY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I have played the first and second witcher games! I am sure that the first one has a lot of good stuff but all I really took away was that it was weird relative to modern games and it took a lot of willpower to finish. The second game is bad fucking ass! Buuuut the difficulty scaling and overall pacing is a bit odd. For example you can play on a relatively high difficulty and the base gameplay is very reasonable and fun but the bosses are just absolutely batshit and you’ll get stuck in a loop where youre dying about 2.5 seconds after reloading endlessly edit: and if you haven’t played 3 youre missing out! It is super fun and playing on death march is actually really rewarding and fun

    • @DragonTypeWyvern
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The Witcher 1 is a pretty standard CRPG styled like the original Baldur’s Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Knights of the Old Republic, etc, and all essentially running a modified Dungeons and Dragons ruleset behind the scenes.

      It probably did feel a little dated because it simply was dated, even for 2007 and with some of the changes they made to keep things interesting.

      However, they did show boobies, so, you know.

    • @Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      First one has the best Alchemy system of the three, which only got progressively worse with each entry. I also felt more satisfaction researching monsters and their strengths/weaknesses prior to encounters in 1. The other games for whatever reason didn’t quite scratch that same itch, but were obviously better in most other ways. All in all, I think I liked 1 and 3 the most.