• Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    English
    46
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    For everyone in the back of the room, monopoly in the context doesn’t require to literally have no other choice. It’s enough for the alternatives to be impractical as in not widely used in practice.

    • TheMurphy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      168 months ago

      Well that’s an easy one then, if that’s true.

      Especially for Apple phones, damn.

      • @DragonTypeWyvern
        link
        English
        78 months ago

        Yeah it’s pretty obnoxious how much control the app stores have.

        It does make device security easier, but

    • @rchive@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      Is it possible that alternatives are not widely used because most people don’t want to use alternatives in the first place?

      • Avid Amoeba
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Sure it is. It doesn’t change the monopoly position. The real question isn’t whether this is a monopoly but whether it’s being abused. E.g. imagine if Google charged 99% fee on any sale via the Play Store. Or if Google disallowed alternative methods of payment but their own for any app distributed on the Play Store.