• @theuberwalrus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -210 months ago

      You’re the one who thinks that the CEO to worker pay ratio is literally only about the CEO. You also think that cash on hand can be freely distributed to workers if that’s what management wants. I’m not the idiot here. You are.

      • @SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        If you mean something other than CEO to worker pay, perhaps you should articulate that. You still have not made any sense whatsoever.

        Cash on hand can absolutely be spent in a wide variety of ways, be it M&A, disaster scenarios, or sudden changes to business structure. That’s one of the most significant purposes of cash on hand.

        Have you ever worked in a senior position at a company? Ever run your own business?

        • @theuberwalrus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -210 months ago

          Everyone who is not an idiot knows that it’s about executive pay in general vs worker pay.

          Way to not address the specific point I made about cash. But answer this instead: who owns the cash a company generates?

          • @twistypencil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            You two stop. You are acting like people who misunderstand each other because of words, but are flinging around attacks because the medium is restricting your ability to have a constructive discussion. Now kiss and make up

          • @SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Everyone who is not an idiot knows that it’s about executive pay in general vs worker pay.

            Lol this is nonsense.

            First off, executives are literally workers. You claim to have an MBA in your post history yet you understand nothing about how businesses actually work