Screenshot doesn’t even show half.

    • @QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      snap/flatpak >500mb

      Don’t know about Snap, but Flatpak download sizes decrease significantly after installing the main platform libraries, they can become really small; of course that’s pretty much fully negated if you’re installing Electron apps, but even then 500MB isn’t very accurate, more like 150MB on average

      flatpak run com.very.easy.to.remember.and.type.name

      Yes I hate it, what is even more annoying is that you can do flatpak install someapp and it will search matches on its own, it shows them to you to let you decide, but after that you can’t do flatpak run someapp because it “doesn’t exist”

    • @Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      Runtimes are okay, the problem is there is no runtime package manager and often you have like 7 of them, which is horrible. But on modern hard drives also no problem.

      Appimages cant be easily ran from terminal, you need to link then to your Path.

      For Flatpak I made a tool that aliases their launch commands to be very easy.

    • Gamey
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      Appimage literally requires more storage for the apps because it dublicates all dependencies so in terms of storage flatpak and dnaps win by FAR, there are valid reasons to criticize all three but your comment is a sad joke!