• @barsoap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    2810 months ago

    Bill Gates at least can code. His contributions to Microsoft were mostly being a cutthroat businessman, but he can code, and did, in particular the MS Basic runtime. It’s all fuzzy but I’d put him at that stage where you can code, but look at your colleagues and realise that you probably shouldn’t. The not so fabled 1x developer. Not entirely rarely well-suited both as manager and QA because they understand enough to be helpful but, ego permitting, seeing they have no talent, don’t get their creative instincts tied up with actually writing code.

    Steve Jobs, OTOH…

    • @phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1810 months ago

      Bill Gates main contribution was having is mommy get him a deal to provide an OS to IBM.

      Gates didn’t have an OS, so he bought DOS from another company and repackaged it as his own to licensed it to IBM.

    • BitOneZero @ .world
      link
      fedilink
      510 months ago

      Steve Jobs main claim was that visual design and walling people into marriage of software + hardware as a package was important. And based on the loyalty, profits, he seemed to have focused on the right thing.

      As quick as Apple could, they went away from the kit Apple I into expensive unique-looking systems. The Lisa being US$9,995 (equivalent to well over $30,000 in 2023)… NeXT was pretty much the same high-end vision.

      Bill Gates bailing out Apple so there could be two main companies like Pepsi and Coke, I really don’t get why people don’t criticize that. Microsoft was ahead in the Smartphone area long before the iPhone, if they had not bailed out Apple…