• GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems pretty petty, no? The films have different target audiences, and even if they didn’t, does the free market not also apply to Hollywood?

    • Odusei@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There are plenty of things you’re allowed to do that are still kinda shitty. Nolan feels like WB is lashing out at him for bailing on them after they bailed on Tenet. He thinks they’re trying to eat his receipts, and he’s probably right. Nolan burned a lot of bridges on his way out of WB.

      • 77slevin@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        after they bailed on Tenet.

        Wise decision. That was a mess of a movie. And no, it’s clear I don’t worship at the altar of Nolan.

  • BlooregardQKazoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nolan chose to speak his mind about WB releasing other directors’ movies on streaming, insulting the studio in the process. If this is true then he’s just reaping what he sowed.

    I’m hardly a fan of Warner Bros management but I’m a big fan of consequences for being an unprofessional dick.