The proposed rules will criminalize the non-consensual sharing of intimate images, including deepfakes made by AI tools, which could help deter revenge porn.
The article has no mention of criminalising AI generated porn, only deepfakes?
To my understanding it does?
The proposed rules will criminalize the non-consensual sharing of intimate images, including deepfakes made by AI tools, which could help deter revenge porn. Cyber-stalking, online harassment, misogynous hate speech and “cyber-flashing,” or the sending of unsolicited nudes, will also be recognized as criminal offenses.
Where does it mention AI generated porn in that? AI generated deeepfakes, sure but not catch-all AI porn.
For example if someone made some AI hentai porn, what part of that sentence would imply that’s going to be criminalised, because I can’t see it in there.
I think I see your point. It looks like this proposal is related to humans specifically, not artwork.
I think it’s more about the “non-consensual” part of the first sentence in the article. Ai generated porn of nobody in particular=probably fine. Ai generated porn of a real life person=probably unethical.
