Meet the latest way the superrich prove they’re really, totally worried about the environment: $10 million electric superyachts::Electric cars? The superrich have already moved on to electric yachts.

  • DrManhattan@lemmy.design
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Electric boats seem like a great idea, especially with all the pollution the really large cruise ships put out. I’m happy to finally see this become mainstream. On the water there’s nothing to really get in the way of solar panels, either, so it makes sense to have them for charging.

      • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The sad part is that shit isn’t even close to a “super” yatch. It’s a very large fancy sailboat. A super yatch is a hole different ball game.

      • DrManhattan@lemmy.design
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I disagree, but I also don’t have a problem with people or companies being wealthy enough to make or own them, either.

            • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Of course people should be allowed to own nice things that they enjoy.

              The problem is that these specific people are only able to afford these specific nice things because of economic systems that are based on hundreds of millions of people not being able to afford any nice things in life, ever.

              Not that I’m specifically blaming multimillionaires and billionaires for the shortcomings of global economy systems.

              They have just benefitted from them in the same way other people are suffering from them.

            • eleitl@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Does ecosystem carrying capacity overshoot ring a bell? Individual footprint matters, especially if massively oversized.

                • eleitl@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  10 MUSD boats made from graphite epoxy composite and quite a few tons of lithium batteries. And the support infrastructure. And the sum of activities on the cruise. Plus other stuff people who buy such trinkets engage in.

                  There are peer reviewed publications quantifying that, with some surprising numbers in them. The golden billion has an outsized footprint, but the elites have a hockey stick shaped contribution distribution there.

          • MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            See communist China for a primer on why it’s not a great idea to discourage success.

            • Quokka@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              See fascist America for a primer on why it’s not a good to make success dependent on economic upbringing.

              Also if your idea of success is a multi million dollar yacht, than 99.99% of us will never be successful by that metric, so why want to uphold it.

            • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              They literally have the world’s biggest economy and the second most amount of billionaires on the planet behind the US. I don’t think monetary success is being discouraged over there like you think it is.

      • qooqie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Are you thinking he’s joking because electricity + water = zap zap? Because I’ve got some bad news for you about what boats have been carrying around for a very long time. Some underwater boats, let’s call those subs, even carry explosives that if detonated could destroy a city of 3mil+

        Edit: see Morse’s comment below for explanation, makes a lot more sense

        • morsebipbip@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          No ! it’s because $10 million yachts for billionnaires are of course not good for the environment ! It’s greenwashing ! “well yeah i’m a billionnaire and i run an ecocidal megacorporation but look : my luxury superyacht is electric !” i’m baffled that people could ever think this is a good way to mitigate the climate crisis

          • morsebipbip@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            TL;DR electric $10M yachts aren’t good for the environment ; not building any yacht at all is the best answer

              • morsebipbip@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t think a 10 million dollar yacht, be it electric, diesel or diesel powered, is anywhere near a reasonable compromise

                • wtfeweguys@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I find them to be excessive as well, but since we have no power over wealthy people being conspicuous consumers the idea that they shouldn’t exist is unfortunately an unattainable ideal.

                  On the flipside, expensive toys like these often support R&D that eventually reaches more mass market production products.

                  People talked a lot of smack about the original Telsa Roadster (not getting into the politics of Elon here, what a mess), but the Roadster helped fund the Model S which funded the Model X, 3, and Y and ultimately forced every other vehicle manufacturer to get in the EV game.

                  When faced with situations out of my control I try to find the best path to beneficial outcomes.

  • Maraval26@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Regular sailboats have very low fuel consumption. Like 30HP motors used only when not possible to put the sails. Here it is not a sailboat, this is a luxury appartement on water. The carbon footprint will never be neutralized.

  • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The first thing you notice about the boat is the curved solar paneling, which is curved

  • JTode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is ultimately symbolic of how much electric transport is actually going to bring to the Solutions side of the board. The whole thing is a collective self-reassurance that no, we will never have to give up our personal cars. Cause unlike 10,000 years of ice age-surviving ancestors, we would perish under any such arrangement.

  • jsveiga@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it’s a sailboat, it’s supposed not to use motors most of the time anyway. Sailboats use solar panels and wind generators since they became available.

    Now, if it’s not a real sailboat, but a electric motorboat with a sail just for helping, then it does not deserve the environmental badge. Solar panel power is not significant enough to move a boat, comparing to real sails.

  • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Electric boats are not something new. Pre-nuclear military submarines were electric with batteries charged by diesel generators. There are some industrial boats that use electric motors powered by diesel generators. Same for freight trains which have been using that configuration for many years.

    A substantial generator is required for a large electric power boat, no way around it. It may not need to run full time if there’s a battery, but it would still need to supply the bulk of consumed electrical power. Not really any environmental benefit. Though there are some other benefits in terms of operating costs.

    It’s possible to go all electric without a combustion powered generator on a sailboat. That’s feasible and you don’t need a $10M boat to do it, can be done with any sailboat. Though one thing is a boat must have a reliable motor to be seaworthy. You’d still need a generator backup. In that article they state the featured boat does have one. It would have to support the full electrical load of motor, charging, and accessory so I’d expect it to be pretty hefty.

    The title of that article is a fallacy really. Sailboats are environmentally friendly anyway. Doesn’t matter if they have an internal combustion engine or electric motor. You only use the motor in situations where you can’t sail such as tight channels or doldrums. That’s infrequent enough to be negligible. Though I have seen people who own sailboats just motor them around all the time. You gotta wonder why buy a sailboat if you’re just going to motor everywhere, but people do it.

  • Teknikal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Electric boats sound like a good idea to me couldn’t wind, solar and tidal power all be combined. Making me wonder why supertankers, cargoships etc can’t be doing some of that.

    • Galluf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue is energy density. There’s a reason why boat tanks are ~6 times larger than a cars gas tank. That’s why they’re so expensive (plus batteries are much heavier).