I’m not saying color grading is a bad thing, but I personally prefer natural lighting in games over “cinematic” filters.

See more examples: https://imgur.com/a/z6zyTo4

    • pwnstar@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes.

      There is literally no white point reference either, so the altered image is just assumed.

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think the original is that bad honestly, but I do install reshade in just about every game I play so I can understand. Bottom picture has too high contrast though and levels need adjusted.

    • apinanaivot@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s a matter of taste. I set the contrast so that the brightest pixel in the scene is 100% white, and the darkest 100% black, so there is the highest possible dynamic range (and nothing is over or underexposed). The vanilla kind of looks like there is mist everywhere since it’s so washed out.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        You may prefer that contrast but I wouldn’t call it “natural lighting”

        I don’t mean this negatively at all but it reminds me of the photo edits I would make when I first discovered that stuff looks cool if you crush the blacks a bit. That’s not how stuff looks with our eyes but it does look nice

      • IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But nothing in reality is 100% black except Vanta Black paint. A painter who makes realistic paintings will never use pure black except for mixing.

        • emptyother@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          But pc screens cant show pure black either. By using the full range of colors, we have more range to show different shades of black without creating a banding effect.

      • emptyother@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I prefer crushing the whites (a bit of overexposure) than crushing the black. It feels more realistic.

        Do people have differences in how bright they see the worlds colors, I wonder? I know, of personal experience, that colors for a single person can literally look bleaker when one is depressed. And then theres people with better night vision than others.

  • PotjiePig@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The first one looks natural to me. The second grade looks like a 1st year film school grade where they think the full range has to be used at all times. In a soft well lit room the contrast would never be that high.

    The intention was clearly to make it look like a warm interior, adding all those grungy green tones make it look like she’s standing by a window. I dunno the context of the room, but number 1 looks way better to me…

    Edit: Final thought - crushing blacks like that, from a game perspective means you may miss details that may have been meant to be seen. But power to you! Options are always better.

    • skankhunt42@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eyesight is wild, personally the second one looks more realistic to me.

      But you are right, options are always better

  • Cloudless ☼@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fallout New Vegas is only playable with the piss filter disabled (via mods).

    Starfield looks ok, I think the colours add a bit of alien atmosphere.