Unfortunately, the prime minister won’t endorse his minister.

  • ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a car enthusiast, yes, please! I enjoy pleasure cruises on sunny weekends in my summer car, but let’s treat it like the luxury it is: expensive, heavily taxed, and not required to get from A-B. These policies and investments would make getting around more pleasant for everyone, and make the road that much more enjoyable to use on recreational occasions. I can assure you that what I love about driving is not from being stuck in bumper-to-bumper traffic, and emitting tons of emissions using fuel whose monetary cost doesn’t include externalized costs.

    • Athéna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s completely required for literally anyone in a city or town that has little to no public transportation. Unless cities completely transform public transit we will need cars.

      • ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I won’t disagree with you. I interpret the Minister’s remarks as suggesting that we should make it so that at least half of Quebecoise have the option of going carless, and choose to take it. I don’t think anyone is seriously advocating for a ban on cars without any investment in alternatives.

      • jerkface@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not literally anyone. Poor people don’t require cars. Funny, right? How do poor people manage without a car OR money, when everyone else apparently needs both?

  • TemporaryBoyfriend@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here’s an easy way to do it. Tax everything to do with cars - licenses, registrations, fuel, fluids (oil, transmission, coolant, etc.), tires, and insurance – and direct 100% of that money into public transit projects - increasing frequency and reliability of existing service, adding new services and routes, and offsetting fees for users. The best transit is cheap, fast, and good.

    • chemsed@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      One the parties in opposition suggested a tax for power-hungry cars and they got attacked on it during the last campaign. The population must accept the difficult choice, because the status quo is not sustainable.

  • stepan@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    More renewable energy , less fossil fuels

    More density, less sprawl

    More transit, less cars